On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:10:08PM +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Now that ATAGS support is well contained, we can easily remove it from > > the kernel build if so desired. It has to explicitly be disabled, and > > only when DT support is selected. > > > > Note: disabling kernel ATAGS support does not prevent the usage of > > CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- > > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 5 +++-- > > arch/arm/kernel/atags.h | 11 +++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > index c5f9ae5dbd..5c7302e208 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > @@ -1891,12 +1891,6 @@ config CC_STACKPROTECTOR > > neutralized via a kernel panic. > > This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above. > > > > -config DEPRECATED_PARAM_STRUCT > > - bool "Provide old way to pass kernel parameters" > > - help > > - This was deprecated in 2001 and announced to live on for 5 years. > > - Some old boot loaders still use this way. > > - > > endmenu > > Since you're in this area, do we need to carry this forward? If somebody is > using it then obviously we have to keep it but it might be worth asking > around.
That should be a separate patch if that has to be dropped. Right now that code is already in a file of its own and not getting in the way of anything else, and I didn't want to change any behavior on legacy platforms. > Back on topic, this looks good to me: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Thanks. Nicolas _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
