On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
> > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a > > way that drivers can use it - there will be drivers (perhaps not display > > ones) that have a known power sequence and which could benefit from the > > ability to use library code to implement it based on the user simply > > supplying named resources. > Not sure I understand what you mean, but things should be working this way > already - regulators and PWMs are acquired by name using the standard > regulator_get() and pwm_get() functions. GPIOs do not, AFAIK, have a way to > be > referenced by name so their number is used instead. Right, but the sequencing for enabling them is currently open coded in each driver. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
