On 09/26/2012 11:40 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:06 Tue 25 Sep , Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >> >> This series adds some build rules to run cpp on *.dts-cpp prior to >> invoking dtc, and converts Tegra to the new rule as an example. What do >> people think? >> >> I assume that you've applied the dtc patches I sent yesterday. They >> aren't in this series. See: >> >> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-September/020182.html >> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-September/020183.html >> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-September/020181.html >> >> Note: those patches are against upstream dtc. If you wish to test this >> series, apply the dtc patches to upstream dtc, build it, and copy the >> resultant dtc binary over the top of scripts/dtc/dtc. >> >> Stephen Warren (3): >> kbuild: introduce cmd_dtc_cpp >> ARM: use cmd_dtc_cpp for compilation of *.dts-cpp to *.dtb >> ARM: tegra: compile all DT files with cpp > > I do not like the extention
It is a bit unwieldy. Perhaps *.dtsp, *.dtsip would be better. > can we run gcc everytime? Not without editing all the device tree files; any property (or node) name the starts with a # must be escaped; changed from "#foo" to "\#foo" to avoid cpp attempting to interpret it as a pre-processor directive. > or just do as done for lds > > *.dts.S .S means assembly. (that's why I went with .dts-cpp rather than .dts.cpp). _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
