Από το iPhone μου
6 Νοε 2012, 12:16, ο/η Grant Likely <[email protected]> έγραψε: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Nov 6, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote: >>> Sure, so if we add data type supplementary properties to the tree to >>> indicate the data type as "indirect phandle", then kernel could refer >>> to the index in the got-like table to fetch the actual phandle address >>> (1-level of indirection), instead of directly using the address in the >>> data field. >> >> I'm fine with this. > > But if the data about phandles is already in the tree, then the need > for a GOT simply goes away. The phandles can be fixed up directly and > it is so much better because it works with existing parsing code after > the merge is applied. > Either way works. It is your call after all. I agree that your method is simpler. > g. Regards -- Pantelis _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
