On 11/06/2012 04:29 PM, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:00:31AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >> >> Not all /bin/echo implementations support the -e option. Instead, use >> printf, which appears to be more widely available than /bin/echo -e. >> >> See commit eaec1db "fdtget-runtest.sh: Fix failures when /bin/sh isn't >> bash" for history. >> >> I have tested this on Ubuntu 10.04 with /bin/sh pointing to both dash >> and bash. >> >> Reported-by: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> # and implemented-by >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >> --- >> Mike, should I re-write this with you as the git author? If so, could >> you please supply an S-o-b line for this? >> --- >> tests/fdtget-runtest.sh | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/fdtget-runtest.sh b/tests/fdtget-runtest.sh >> index c3a3559..8d8b058 100755 >> --- a/tests/fdtget-runtest.sh >> +++ b/tests/fdtget-runtest.sh >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ rm -f $LOG $EXPECT >> trap "rm -f $LOG $EXPECT" 0 >> >> expect="$1" >> -/bin/echo -e $expect >$EXPECT >> +printf '%b\n' "$expect" > $EXPECT > > Um.. this is made to apply on top of the /bin/echo patch, but AFAICT > that was never committed..
I believe it's commit eaec1db "fdtget-runtest.sh: Fix failures when /bin/sh isn't bash"; my local git certainly shows Jon as the committer for that change. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
