On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:23:03 +1100 David Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hrm. The patch comment shows a lot of sparse warnings, but the patch > looks like the basic conversion of the code from uint32_t to > annontated fdt32_t types. not sure what you're getting at: isn't this to be expected? Anyway, I'm going to guess you mean to re-word the commit message. > I also never saw a 3/4. Has something gone > wrong with the patch sending? I sent 3/4 in reply-to your comments on v1 of the patch, and the rest without the reply-to reference, so 3/4 might show up out of order in your inbox, depending on how it's configured. I'll send the entire series with the same reference - jdl's comments to v2 - instead next time. Kim _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
