On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:50:07 -0500, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thursday 23 August 2012 21:36:25 David Gibson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:15:39PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > > Following advice from Jon Loeliger, I would suggest that a new release > > > of DTC be tagged and packaged. > > > > > > It is important for some projects to rely on a released version, rather > > > than use a random cset from the repository. Comes to mind, the automated > > > build-systems, such as buildroot. > > > > > > Of course, I can help, if need be! ;-) > > > > > > Are there any others who think that a release would make sense? > > > > This has been a bit of a perrenial problem. dtc development has been > > sufficiently gradual that there haven't been many obvious points for > > making new releases. dtc developers (i.e. Jon and my, mostly) don't > > feel much pain from the lack of releases, since the git snapshots > > generally work well (thanks to limited scope and a good testsuite). > > > > I wonder if we should move to a model of just making a release every 3 > > or 6 months from whatever happens to be in the tree at the time > > (barring obvious known breakage, of course). > > yes please. even just a version that uses datestamps would be fine. > -mike
Fine by me. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
