Hi Mark,
On 11/20/2012 18:27, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:31:22PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote:
based on ASoC tree? And the upper go into pinctrl tree?
---<8---
ssc0: ssc@fffbc000 {
compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc";
reg = <0xfffbc000 0x4000>;
interrupts = <14 4 5>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ssc0_tx &pinctrl_ssc0_rx>;
status = "disable";
};
--->8---
Any suggestion for this? what should I do with this patch for next?
Send it to pinctrl and we'll deal with the add/add.
So, should I keep these two patches [1] and [2] and then send to pinctrl
again, or I need keep it in one patch as [3] which i sent first.
1. [Resend,v6,1/2] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl nodes
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753101/
2. [Resend,v6,2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1753091/
3. [v6,1/4] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1740391/
Best regards,
Bo Shen
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
