> The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than > just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.
Ah, right. How did I forget about that nice piece? > I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the > call graph make any clk api calls? Are you talking over i2c to a > regulator? If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I > hit when trying to make a general solution. So, how is your "reentrancy in the common clk framework" series[1] going on? Haven't seen any update since August. Shawn [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/182198 _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
