On Friday 11 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
> We have tightly coupled the link-time dependency for
> omap_dma_filter_fn by going down the path of using
> dma_request_slave_channel_compat() as Tony suggested to avoid extra
> ifdefry.
>
> That dependency will go away naturally if all the "legacy" OMAP platforms
> were required to only boot from DT...just as a newly added SoCs are.
>
> Are you suggesting unwinding the _compat() approach?
No, I was thinking we could define omap_dma_filter_fn to NULL
for the DT-only case.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
