Hi Vivek,

On Tuesday 15 of January 2013 19:08:30 Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Adding OHCI device tree node for Exynos5250 along with
> the device base address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt         |   15
> +++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                  |   
> 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt index
> e8bbb47..f66fcdd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt
> @@ -23,3 +23,18 @@ Example:
>               interrupts = <0 71 0>;
>               samsung,vbus-gpio = <&gpx2 6 1 3 3>;
>       };
> +
> +OHCI
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4210-ohci" for USB 2.0
> +   OHCI companion controller in host mode.
> + - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> mapped +   region.
> + - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu.
> +
> +Example:
> +     usb@12120000 {
> +             compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci";
> +             reg = <0x12120000 0x100>;
> +             interrupts = <0 71 0>;
> +     };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index 2cbe53e..ebb0907 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
> @@ -281,6 +281,12 @@
>               interrupts = <0 71 0>;
>       };
> 
> +     usb@12120000 {
> +             compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci";
> +             reg = <0x12120000 0x100>;
> +             interrupts = <0 71 0>;

For Samsung platforms we decided per board enabling of nodes and so this 
node should also contain:

                status = "disabled";

while in dts file of board using ohci there would be an overriding entry:

        usb@12120000 {
                status = "okay";
        };

I know that Exynos5250 has not been yet converted into this convention, 
but using it when adding new devices will simplify the process.

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to