Hi Stephen, Mark
Thank you for your checking > >> Rename that simple-audio,dma-controller perhaps? "platform" is a word > >> specific to ASoC, and the bindings really should be generic across OSs. (snip) > I still don't understand why the ASoC platform has to be exposed in > device tree; it seems like something completely internal to the ASoC > driver. Take a look at the Tegra ASoC DT bindings; the platform isn't in > DT at all there. OK, I checked Tegra sounds, and it is using same device pointer for platform and cpu. My FSI is same style. But I wonder is this normal style ? >> Mark If it is very normal style, I can remove "platform" from simple-audio. Thank you > > Ahh yes, this simple-audio supports both phandle and name matching for > > compatibility. > > example showed phandle matching only. > > I think the DT binding should only support phandle-based resolution. > Name-based resolution would be quite odd for a device tree binding. I see. I will remove name-base matching from simple-audio Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
