Hi Stephen > On 02/25/2013 01:51 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Current ASoC has register function for platform/codec/dai/card, > > but doesn't have for cpu. > > It often produces confusion and fault on ASoC. > > This patch adds very basic register function for cpu > > This seems reasonable to me. > > I can't recall how much influence the existing CODEC objects have on the > various routing/matching decisions inside the ASoC core. While this > patch does register and unregister CPU objects, I wonder if it should > have more impact on any of the existing core code? Certainly I'd expect > the CPU objects to show up in ASoC's debugfs and any similar files...
This patch doesn't have any impact to existing drivers. It just added new cpu list. > So as far as it goes, > Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> > > But I suspect this patch might need to do a bunch of other stuff too, or > add a bunch of follow-on patches for that? If Mark can accept this new feature (= register CPU), I think we can start to switch to use it. But current struct CPU is very very simple, and it doesn't have any effect for existing code Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
