On 03/12/2013 06:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 04:35 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> commit 5553f9e (cpufreq: instantiate cpufreq-cpu0 as a platform_driver) >> now forces platform device to be registered for allowing cpufreq-cpu0 >> to be used by SoCs. example: drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c >> >> However, for SoCs that wish to link up using device tree, instead >> of platform device, provide compatibility string match: >> compatible = "cpufreq,cpu0";
You cannot add a non-HW relative binding... DT is supposed to represent the pure HW. AFAIK, cpufreq has nothing to do with the HW definition. >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]> >> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 3 +++ >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >> > Looks fine to me. CC'ing dt list in case some one has > comments on binding updates. > > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]> Not-Acked-by-me. Regards, Benoit _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
