On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Mack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/20/2013 09:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> The same data is now available in sysfs, so we can remove the code >>> that exports it in /proc and replace it with a symlink to the sysfs >>> version. >>> >>> Tested on versatile qemu model and mpc5200 eval board. More testing >>> would be appreciated. >> >> I would suggest testing with lshw in particular. That's the only >> /proc/device-tree user I've come across. > > kexec is another one. Not to mention various vendor scripts that aren't > necessarily public. > > Don't such things also fall under the "we do not break userspace > compatibility - ever" rule?
Correct. I've got no intention of applying this without testing the major users first. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
