On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:19:05AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 09:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:56:41PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> >> +  clocks = <&tegra_car 106>, <&tegra_car 107>, <&tegra_car 30>, +
> >> <&tegra_car 11>, <&tegra_car 18>, <&tegra_car 101>, +
> >> <&tegra_car 102>, <&tegra_car 108>, <&tegra_car 109>, +
> >> <&tegra_car 110>, <&tegra_car 162>; +      clock-names = "d_audio",
> >> "apbif", "i2s0", "i2s1", "i2s2", +         "i2s3", "i2s4", "dam0",
> >> "dam1", "dam2", +          "spdif_in";

> > ...this is exactly what I was worried about with the clock bindings
> > :/

> What's the exact issue here? The length of the list is rather
> determined by the HW, so I don't think there's much one can do about that.

The fact that it's two lists that need to be matched up.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to