On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matt Sealey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If we're dealing with audio codecs, fix the audio codec to accept a
>> *table* of possible clock values and if that hardware operates
>> differently per clock value, then add that data in there too (like the
>> cs42l52 audio codec). Where the software and hardware is a little more
>> dynamic, the same binding works here - and the usual trick is just
>> force one configuration possible out of many. The board designer can
>> look at all the possibilities and choose the one or two or all that
>> will work with the design, and it can go into the device tree.
>
> Sorry, but I have a hard time following a so long response.
>
> Can't you just send patches to the list with your proposal so that we
> can move forward with the idea?

Sure.

-- 
Matt Sealey <[email protected]>
Product Development Analyst, Genesi USA, Inc.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to