Hi Rob, Am Donnerstag, den 04.04.2013, 08:49 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring: > On 03/28/2013 11:35 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > From: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> > > > > This binding is intended to represent the hardware reset signals present > > internally in most IC (SoC, FPGA, ...) designs. > > It consists of a binding for a reset controller device (provider), and a > > pair of properties, "resets" and "reset-names", to link a device node > > (consumer) to its reset controller via phandle, similarly to the clock > > and interrupt bindings. > > > > The reset controller has all information necessary to reset the consumer > > device. That could be provided via device tree, or it could be implemented > > in hardware. > > The aim is to enable device drivers to request a framework API to issue a > > reset simply by providing their struct device pointer as the most common > > case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > > Looks good. > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Thank you. I'll not add the Acked-by: line to the patch itself, if that's ok, since Shawn already pulled it into his imx/soc branch. regards Philipp _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
