On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Jon Hunter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 02:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Jon Hunter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> When booting with device-tree the function pointer for detecting context
>>> loss is not populated. Ideally, the pm_runtime framework should be
>>> enhanced to allow a means for reporting context/state loss and we could
>>> avoid populating such function pointers altogether. In the interim until
>>> a generic non-device specific solution is in place, force a restore of
>>> the gpio bank when enabling the gpio controller.
>>>
>>> Adds a new device-tree property for the OMAP GPIO controller to indicate
>>> if the GPIO controller is located in a power-domain that never loses
>>> power and hence will always maintain its logic state.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
>>
>> In this case it'd be really helpful to get an ACK from somebody else.
>> I have no clue whether this thing is doing what it should, and if
>> you were the maintainer I'd apply it but now I'd like to hear from
>> Kevin or Santosh first...
>
> Santosh gave the his ACK for 1-4 (see 0/5) and Kevin added his
> reviewed-by for 1-4 (again see 0/5).

OK all in patch 0 how confusing #-)

All patches applied with Kevin's and Santosh's tags!

Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to