On 04/11/2013 04:42 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote: >> + { "r5g6b5", 16, {11, 5}, {5, 6}, {0, 5}, {0, 0} }, > > Why "r5g6b5" instead of "rgb565", which is what's commonly used?
Both representations appear commonly used. I mentioned my rationale in response to V1: "r5g6b5" is a much more well-defined structure. It's directly algorithmically parse-able if required, whereas you'd need somewhat more complex heuristics to determine exactly what rgb565 or argb2101010 mean, since all the numbers are run together without delimiters. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
