On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:42:49PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > > + /* > > + * This driver doesn't need to know which actual hardware is used. > > + * The audmux driver has knowledge about it's type, and returns > > + * an error if executed on the wrong type of hardware. > > + */ > > + ret = phycore_ac97_pca100_audmux(); > > + if (!ret) > > + return 0; > > + > > + ret = phycore_ac97_pcm043_audmux(); > > The DT really ought to be able to give enough information to figure out > the audmux configuration. If we can't do that it rather defeats the > point of moving to DT...
Yes you are right, I added a phandle "phytec,audmux" to check which audmux setup function we have to use. Regards, Markus -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
