On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Could I get some testing support please? I've applied the patch that >> makes device nodes into kobjects into the following branch and build >> tested it on a bunch of platforms. What I need now is boot testing on >> different architectures. >> >> If you can build this tree and make sure it doesn't break your >> platforms with OF support I would greatly appreciate it. >> >> Also, if you turn off CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE, a symlink will be >> created to the /sys/firmware representation which should be >> functionally identical. For those of you using tools that read >> /proc/device-tree (like kexec), I would also appreciate if you can >> test that those tools still work with CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE turned >> off. >> >> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux devicetree/experimental > > I gave it a quick test on i.MX53 (qsb) and i.MX27 (phycore i.MX27). > Both seem to work just normally. I also made a > > diff -urN /proc/device-tree /sys/firmware/ofw/device-tree > > with CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE enabled (so no symlink). Indeed both > trees are identical. > > So: > > Tested-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Great, thanks! g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
