On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:21:26AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> Hmm..sorry I don't fully get it. Does that mean I should do something like:
> struct wm8962_priv {
>       struct wm8962_pdata pdata;

> instead of pointer? so no devm_kzalloc() for it any more?

Yes.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to