On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:47:42 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Ideally 'ranges' entry should be added in device tree source files. > However, since those properties do not inherit the entries from included > files it would be a duplication hell, which means a nightmare to > maintain. > > So, instead of hardcoding the required translation entries, we update > them programatically, whenever a decoding window is allocated. > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com>
I'm in the middle of reading through this thread, and I'll have some better comments for you then, but in the mean time I wanted to reply to this patch. As far as the kernel is concerned, the DT is *not* a live structure. It is a static description of the system. There are cases where we do runtime updates to the tree, but those are restricted to either fixups for broken trees, or because firmware told us to at runtime. Modifying the data in the tree out of convenience has all kinds of problems. Rather, the data in the tree should make it clear that there is a gap in the translation from one node to another and defer to the bus driver to provide a custom translation when requested without modifying the tree. g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
