On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 23:32:42 +0200, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>> I guess your solution is the least intrusive one. Still, it could happen >> that of_match_table is scanned three times (by driver core, i2c layer, >> and i2c driver) which is IMO an indication to look for a more elegant >> solution tp find out what really matched? > > It's what we do on platform_devices. It really isn't an expensive > operation so I haven't pushed anyone to go optimize it. I tried to think of something and it ended up with ideas like decorating the device tree representation and it was just ... ouch. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
