On Thursday, June 13, 2013 11:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 13 June 2013 22:22:31 Jingoo Han wrote:
> 
> > +struct pcie_port_info {
> > +   u32             cfg0_size;
> > +   u32             cfg1_size;
> > +   u32             io_size;
> > +   u32             mem_size;
> > +   phys_addr_t     io_bus_addr;
> > +   phys_addr_t     mem_bus_addr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pcie_port {
> > +   struct device           *dev;
> > +   u8                      controller;
> > +   u8                      root_bus_nr;
> > +   void __iomem            *dbi_base;
> > +   void __iomem            *elbi_base;
> > +   void __iomem            *phy_base;
> > +   void __iomem            *purple_base;
> > +   phys_addr_t             cfg0_base;
> > +   void __iomem            *va_cfg0_base;
> > +   phys_addr_t             cfg1_base;
> > +   void __iomem            *va_cfg1_base;
> > +   phys_addr_t             io_base;
> > +   phys_addr_t             mem_base;
> > +   spinlock_t              conf_lock;
> > +   struct resource         cfg;
> > +   struct resource         io;
> > +   struct resource         mem;
> > +   struct pcie_port_info   config;
> > +   struct clk              *clk;
> > +   struct clk              *bus_clk;
> > +   int                     irq;
> > +   int                     reset_gpio;
> > +};
> 
> You mentioned that you'd use u64 for the resources here but did not.

Do you mean the following?

+       u64             cfg0_base;
+       u64             cfg1_base;
+       u64             io_base;
+       u64             mem_base;


> 
> > +
> > +static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 
> > busdev)
> > +{
> > +   u32 val;
> > +   void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->dbi_base;
> > +
> > +   /* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->cfg0_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->cfg0_base + pp->config.cfg0_size - 1,
> > +                   dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, busdev, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 
> > busdev)
> > +{
> > +   u32 val;
> > +   void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->dbi_base;
> > +
> > +   /* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : CFG1 */
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->cfg1_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->cfg1_base + pp->config.cfg1_size - 1,
> > +                   dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, busdev, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
> > +}
> 
> And you still don't set up the UPPER halves, which was really the point
> of my comment. Same thing for all the other ones.

Do you mean the following?

+       writel_rc(pp, pp->cfg1_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+       writel_rc(pp, (pp->cfg1_base >> 32), dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);


> 
> > +static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_inbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > +{
> > +   u32 val;
> > +   void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->dbi_base;
> > +
> > +   /* Program viewport 0 : INBOUND : MEM */
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE | PCIE_ATU_BAR_MODE_ENABLE;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->config.mem_bus_addr,
> > +                   dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->config.mem_bus_addr + pp->config.mem_size - 1,
> > +                   dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->mem_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
> > +}
> 
> This makes even less sense than before, it seems like now you only
> allow DMA between PCI devices but not to main memory.

Sorry, I cannot understand it.
Could you give me more details?
Also, pseudo-code will be very helpful.


> 
> > +static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_io_inbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
> > +{
> > +   u32 val;
> > +   void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->dbi_base;
> > +
> > +   /* Program viewport 1 : INBOUND : IO */
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> > +   val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE | PCIE_ATU_BAR_MODE_ENABLE;
> > +   writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->config.io_bus_addr,
> > +                   dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->config.io_bus_addr + pp->config.io_size - 1,
> > +                   dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, (u64)pp->io_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
> > +   writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
> > +}
> 
> Can you please explain what the inbound window is as I asked you?
> I still don't see why you would need to set it up like this.

Sorry, I was guided to use this inbound from hardware engineer.
without this inbound, Exynos5440 PCIe cannot work at booting.


Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla, Siva Reddy,
Would you explain what the inbound window is?


> 
> > +static int exynos_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> > +{
> > +   struct pcie_port *pp;
> > +
> > +   pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> > +
> > +   if (!pp)
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> > +   pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->io);
> > +   pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->mem);
> 
> Now you are missing the offsets. You have to at least pass an offset for one
> of the I/O spaces, since they are using the same bus address. The offset must
> match the value you pass to pci_ioremap_io.
> 
> For the memory space, you should pass the difference between the physical
> base address and the bus address. That address happens to be zero with
> you DT setup, but I would advise to also try out some other values in DT,
> just to ensure it still works.

Um, I cannot understand it, too.
Could you give me Psuedo-code?
Or, let me know which pcie driver can be the good reference.


> 
> > +   pp->reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "reset-gpio", 0);
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > +
> > +static int __exit exynos_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +   struct pcie_port *pp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +   clk_disable_unprepare(pp->bus_clk);
> > +   clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> 
> You also don't remove the PCI devices here, as mentioned in an earlier
> review.

I reviewed Marvell PCIe driver and Tegra PCIe driver; however,
I cannot know what you mean.

Could let me know which additional functions are needed?



> 
>       Arnd

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to