On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 00:32 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:19:54PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 18:35 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:55:47PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > > @@ -294,6 +316,8 @@ static int wl1271_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> > > >         /* Use block mode for transferring over one block size of data 
> > > > */
> > > >         func->card->quirks |= MMC_QUIRK_BLKSZ_FOR_BYTE_MODE;
> > > >  
> > > > +       sdio_set_drvdata(func, glue);
> > > 
> > > is this move really necessary ?
> > 
> > It is, because I use the glue in wlcore_get_pdata_from_of(), so I need
> > to call sdio_set_drvdata() earlier.  I reckoned it wouldn't hurt to move
> > this, so I wouldn't have to pass the glue in the
> > wlcore_get_pdata_from_of() call.
> 
> that's alright, it does look like it deserves a mention in changelog
> though. Other than that:

Uh, ok.  This was so tiny (and I thought so obvious) a change that I
didn't mention it.  But if you asked about it, it was not obvious
enough. ;) I'll add a small comment about it in the commit message.


> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>

Thanks!

--
Luca.

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to