On 07/15/2013 08:35:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:> +dma0: dma@100300 { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "fsl,elo3-dma"; why does this require a new compatible?
The binding has changed -- there is now a second reg entry. -Scott _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
