Hi, On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Pavel Machek <pa...@denx.de> wrote:
> It sound to me like keeping ammount of -EPROBE_DEFER to minimum is > still preferred. Hand-crafting initcall level ordering of various drivers and subsystem is probably an even greater evil though. We've done it in the past, but now that we have deferred probe we have the option of not having to do it every time, such as this. You're spending an awful lot of energy arguing over this, but nobody has actually shown data of how much deferral is happening -- and that it's a real problem. Until someone does so there's no reason to change it from the default module init level at all, I'd say. -Olof _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
