Dear Hector Palacios,
> Dear Marek,
>
> On 07/19/2013 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> @@ -228,39 +230,12 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> >>
> >> #define LRADC_RESOLUTION 12
> >> #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK ((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION) - 1)
> >>
> >> -/*
> >> - * Raw I/O operations
> >> - */
> >> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>
> >> const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> >> int *val, int *val2, long m)
> >>
> >> {
> >>
> >> struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> >> int ret;
> >>
> >> - unsigned long mask;
> >> -
> >> - if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> - /* Check for invalid channel */
> >> - if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >
> > This was already resolved, so this patch won't apply I'm afraid.
>
> You mean the 'unsigned long mask', right? Yeah, I think I had resolved
> that one before submitting, but looks like I didn't.
> The other check is not resolved afaik. We agreed to remove it, but on a
> different patch.
I mean the other check, yeah. A patch removing that should be applied already.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
