On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:47:53 +1100 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The hard-coded list is pretty simple, at the risk of missing things. > > I'm actually not too wirried about missing things. If we miss > something, it's pretty easy to fix. It probably would be a good idea > to make the testsuite build against the shared version of the library > to verify that at least the functions exercised there are correctly > exposed. That's a good idea. I'll see what I can do there. > I'm marginally more worried about an overbroad wildcard including > something we didn't really want exposed. I think the versioning > script needs a: > local: > * > after the global list to to inhibit exposing everything else. Ah, yes. It would be good for someone with more of a clue than me to vet the list I have in the file right now, and make sure I didn't include/omit things that shouldn't/should be there. Once that is done, I can do the local thing. josh _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
