On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:34:24 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> I tested this on ARM platform(Vexpress TC2). You can add my tested by.
> 
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> 
> On 03/10/13 22:24, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > Can people on powerpc/arm/etc. give this a spin?  This works on my
> > T4-2 sparc64 box.
> > 
> > --------------------
> > of: Make cpu node handling more portable.
> > 
> > Use for_each_node_by_type() to iterate all cpu nodes in the
> > system.
> > 
> > Provide and overridable function arch_find_n_match_cpu_physical_id,
> > which sees if the given device node matches 'cpu' and if so sets
> > '*thread' when non-NULL to the cpu thread number within the core.
> > 
> > The default implementation behaves the same as the existing code.
> > 
> > Add a sparc64 implementation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
> > 
> Tested-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <[email protected]>

I've applied it to my tree and I'll keep an eye out if it causes any
breakage on PowerPC or ARM.

Can someone from PowerPC land give it a spin? I don't have any powerpc
hardware anymore.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to