On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:41:20AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 04:05 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:44:32PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> >> From: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Add device tree support to the DW watchdog timer.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
> >> Acked-by: Jamie Iles <[email protected]>
> >> Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Jamie Iles <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Pawel Moll <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> - Use of_match_ptr() for of_match_table
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dw_wdt.txt | 16
> >> ++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 8 ++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dw_wdt.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dw_wdt.txt
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dw_wdt.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..29e150b
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dw_wdt.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> >> +Synopsys Designware Watchdog Timer
> >> +
> >> +Required Properties:
> >> +
> >> +- Compatiblity : "snps,dw-wdt"
> >
> > This should presumably be:
> >
> > - compatbile: should contain "snps,dw-wdt"
> >
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> s/compatbile/compatible/ :-)
Indeed :)
>
> "must be" or "should contain" ? I see both in various bindings.
> Is there a preference ?
I would prefer "should contain" -- it doesn't preclude future compatible
variants.
>
> >> +- reg : Base address of the watchdog timer register.
> >
> > And the size...
> >
> >> +
> >> +Example:
> >> +
> >> + watchdog0: wd@ffd02000 {
> >> + compatible = "snps,dw-wdt";
> >> + reg = <0xffd02000 0x1000>;
> >> + interrupts = <0 171 4>;
> >
> > This wasn't mentioned.
> >
> > Is it necessary?
> >
>
> From looking into the code ...
>
> The driver doesn't use interrupts, so I guess the answer is no. Cut-and-paste
> error, maybe ?
Does the device have any interrupts, even if they're unused?
>
> > Is it the only interrupt?
> >
> >> + clocks = <&per_base_clk>;
> >
> > Similarly, is this the only clock?
> >
> The driver uses one clock, and it is mandatory.
Is this the only clock into the unit?
Does it have a name?
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
