> > I'd even go further and use "unstable-" as the prefix instead of "!" > > which is way more explicit. > > I guess unstable- is as good as anything. I personally think that "!" is > disturbing enough to the eye to make it abundantly clear that something > is fishy.
"!" marks the binding as "special" whatever that is. A busy person might decide to not look that up as long as it works right now. "unstable-" (or maybe "unstable!-" ;)) is explicit so people know what they get.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
