On Wednesday 13 of November 2013 19:49:15 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:24:04PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> > Well, the label is just for the parser and it does not get into the DTB.
> > This is where the DTS author can make things up just for their own
> > convenience (like main_codec, aux_codec or even cs42l52).
>
> If only we could have comments :)
Comments in DTB? That would be at least interesting. ;)
>
> > I know this is really more bikeshedding than anything useful, but I'd
> > rather try to follow the written rules in ePAPR, instead of nothing at
> > all. At least just to make things more consistent.
>
> My feeling here is that we should be looking more critically at ePAPR -
> if we're picking people up for having what's essentially a comment
> that's too specific we're probably doing something wrong especially
> since the corrected example would look something like:
>
> codec: codec@12 {
>
> which is a bit redundant.
Still, this is not a comment, because it's also available in the
resulting binary representation.
Well, maybe I'm a bit too strict. I wouldn't probably notice this if
I didn't have other comments, so let's say that was just a nitpick of
mine, fixing of which doesn't cost anything, since another version will
have to be spinned anyway.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
