On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:13:36AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > > I know people have been frustrated that they need to keep the DT in sync with > the kernel. But we've always been upfront with the requirement, and why we've > been having it. We're now changing this requirement, which should help sort > out > practically all of the concerns at hand.
Sorry, but this really gets my goat. When have you been upfront about the unstable DT idea? Was it when you suddenly, retrospectively announced this as a fact? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1532141 I asked nicely for a pointer to some documentation of this so-called decision, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1532141 and all I could hear was the crickets. It really looks like you guys have been making this up as you went along. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
