On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 13:18 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
>
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -601,6 +601,23 @@ static inline int of_property_read_u32(const struct
> device_node *np,
> return of_property_read_u32_array(np, propname, out_value, 1);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * of_property_optional - Find one optional property
> + * @np: device node from which the property to be searched.
> + * @propname: name of the optional property to be searched for.
> + *
> + * Get to know whether one optional property is present or not in a
> + * device node.
> + * Returns true if the property is present, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool of_property_optional(const struct device_node *np,
> + const char *propname)
> +{
> + struct property *prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL);
> +
> + return prop ? true : false;
> +}
> +
Exactly how is this different from of_property_read_bool()?
AFAICS it's identical! You may be trying to solve the wrong
problem.
And I'm afraid that the routine's name you picked is even more
confusing. The call site ("if (of_property_optional() ...") will
no longer reflect that it's evaluating a boolean condition.
Being an optional property and being boolean are two completely
different things.
virtually yours
Gerhard Sittig
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
