On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:59 +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > These properties are booleans, and optional? Does it mean that > you cannot _disable_ broken features? Or does it mean that you > _must_ specify the non-broken features and thus break backwards > compatibility? Or are these properties not boolean (they are not > used in the example either, unfortunately), and the binding text > would need an update for clarity? What am I missing?
They're not booleans. I'll update the text to make that clear. -- Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
