Sebastian,

I'm picking on this discussion, with a new Subject.

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 01/21/14 10:12, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > After getting rid of all the mach-specific code, it's now possible
> > to allow builds in any Orion platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > index 5be6e91..1689f72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ config DAVINCI_WATCHDOG
> >
> >   config ORION_WATCHDOG
> >     tristate "Orion watchdog"
> > -   depends on ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_KIRKWOOD || ARCH_DOVE
> > +   depends on PLAT_ORION
[..]
> 
> I haven't checked why ARCH_MVEBU at all added PLAT_ORION as dependency,
> but IIRC it was just because of a missing mbus driver? If it is just
> this, we should also remove PLAT_ORION from ARCH_MVEBU to have a clean
> cut between new common arch and existing sub-archs.
> 

Well, I'm not sure if I'm following you. Many drivers currently depend
on PLAT_ORION, so if we remove PLAT_ORION from ARCH_MVEBU we would have
to replace: s/PLAT_ORION/ARCH_{MVEBU, KIRKWOOD, DOVE, ...}.

Is this the suggested roadmap or I've completely misunderstood it?
-- 
Ezequiel GarcĂ­a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to