The "ti,davinci-no-bd-ram" property for the DaVinci EMAC binding simply can't be
required one, as it's boolean (which means it's absent if false).

While at it, document the property better...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: net/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt
===================================================================
--- net.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt
+++ net/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/davinci_emac.txt
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ Required properties:
 - ti,davinci-ctrl-mod-reg-offset: offset to control module register
 - ti,davinci-ctrl-ram-offset: offset to control module ram
 - ti,davinci-ctrl-ram-size: size of control module ram
-- ti,davinci-no-bd-ram: has the emac controller BD RAM
 - interrupts: interrupt mapping for the davinci emac interrupts sources:
               4 sources: <Receive Threshold Interrupt
                          Receive Interrupt
@@ -22,6 +21,7 @@ Optional properties:
               If absent, davinci_emac driver defaults to 100/FULL.
 - local-mac-address : 6 bytes, mac address
 - ti,davinci-rmii-en: 1 byte, 1 means use RMII
+- ti,davinci-no-bd-ram: boolean, does EMAC has BD RAM?
 
 Example (enbw_cmc board):
        eth0: emac@1e20000 {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to