On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> The only remaining question is if we should create generic DT binding
> >> for fifo depth. Arnd, Rob: Any opinion about it?
> >> Definitely will be worth to have one generic binding if this is generic
> >> feature.
> >> But if this is just specific feature for us then current properties should
> >> be fine.
> >>
> >> In general all these xlnx,XXX properties just reflect all configurable
> >> options
> >> which you can setup in design tool which means that provide full hw
> >> description
> >> with all variants and they are automatically generated from tools.
> >>
> >> Please let me know what you think.
> >
> > I like:
> >
> > rx-fifo-depth
> > tx-fifo-depth
>
> No problem with that. Let Kedar to fix it according this and he will send v2
> with this.
>
Sounds reasonable to me too.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
