On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:49:24PM +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
> 
> >From: Ezequiel Garcia [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt 
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> >> index 03855c8..683a310 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> >> @@ -3,5 +3,9 @@
> >>  - nand-ecc-mode : String, operation mode of the NAND ecc mode.
> >>    Supported values are: "none", "soft", "hw", "hw_syndrome", 
> >> "hw_oob_first",
> >>    "soft_bch".
> >>
> Should nand-ecc-mode also be marked as <deprecated>, and but we continue
> supporting it in kernel code ?

No, I wouldn't deprecate them, as they're in use by the atmel-nand and
mxc-nand drivers.

> If yes, then what is the life-time of these <deprecated> bindings.
> I mean exactly how many kernel versions should
> continue support deprecated bindings ?
> 

Well, if we ever decide to deprecate a DT binding, I'd say we must keep
backwards compatible forever. Yes, forever.

Or at least, until the last user dies or we can steal his board :-)
-- 
Ezequiel GarcĂ­a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to