On 11/02/2014 17:24, Josh Cartwright :
> Instead of the of_find_matching_node()/of_match_node() pair, which requires
> two
> iterations through the match table, make use of
> of_find_matching_node_and_match(),
> which only iterates through the table once.
>
> While we're here, mark the rtsc id table const.
Well, I might remove this one, just because other id tables are not
marked as "const" in the same file... So it can be good to change all of
them in a raw.
> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <jo...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 16 ++++------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> index f7ca97b..e884de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ void __init at91_ioremap_matrix(u32 base_addr)
> }
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-rstc", .data = at91sam9_alt_restart
> },
> { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart },
> { /*sentinel*/ }
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
> struct device_node *np;
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>
> - np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
> + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rstc_ids, &of_id);
> if (!np)
> panic("unable to find compatible rstc node in dtb\n");
>
> @@ -371,10 +371,6 @@ static void at91_dt_rstc(void)
> if (!at91_rstc_base)
> panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
>
> - of_id = of_match_node(rstc_ids, np);
> - if (!of_id)
> - panic("AT91: rtsc no restart function available\n");
> -
> arm_pm_restart = of_id->data;
>
> of_node_put(np);
> @@ -392,7 +388,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
> struct device_node *np;
> const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>
> - np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, ramc_ids);
> + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, ramc_ids, &of_id);
> if (!np)
> panic("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n");
>
> @@ -402,11 +398,7 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
> /* the controller may have 2 banks */
> at91_ramc_base[1] = of_iomap(np, 1);
>
> - of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
> - if (!of_id)
> - pr_warn("AT91: ramc no standby function available\n");
> - else
> - at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
> + at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
Even if it changes the strict behavior of the function, I do not see any
advantage in keeping the pr_warn() path instead of a simple panic()
protecting the "find" and "match" together...
So, without the "const" modification, it ends up with a:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>
=> if you want, I can take the patch with me through arm-soc with at91
material for 3.15 and complete your "const" modification. What do you
think about that?
>
> of_node_put(np);
> }
>
Thanks for having taking care of this file, bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
