On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:08:01PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Воскресенье, 16 февраля 2014, 18:56 +08:00 от Shawn Guo 
> <[email protected]>:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 04:38:44PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > @@ -56,6 +59,55 @@ static const struct of_device_id weim_id_table[] = {
> > >  };
> > >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, weim_id_table);
> > >  
> > > +static int __init imx6q_weim_gpr_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > + struct property *prop;
> > > + const __be32 *p;
> > > + struct regmap *gpr;
> > > + u32 gprvals[4] = {
> > > +         05,     /* CS0(128M) CS1(0M)  CS2(0M)  CS3(0M) */
> > > +         033,    /* CS0(64M)  CS1(64M) CS2(0M)  CS3(0M) */
> > > +         0113,   /* CS0(64M)  CS1(32M) CS2(32M) CS3(0M) */
> > > +         01111,  /* CS0(64M)  CS1(32M) CS2(32M) CS3(0M) */
> > > + };
> > > + u32 gprval = 0;
> > > + u32 val;
> > > + int cs = 0;
> > > + int i = 0;
> > > +
> > > + gpr = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("fsl,imx6q-iomuxc-gpr");
> > 
> > When trying to improve the bindings doc imx-weim.txt, I checked hardware
> > manuals and found that SoCs imx50, imx53, imx6q, imx6dl and imx6sl all
> > need the same CS GPR setup.  It's inappropriate to look up by hard-coded
> > compatible "fsl,imx6q-iomuxc-gpr" then.  So I'm going to add the
> > property fsl,weim-cs-gpr back, and update bindings doc accordingly.
> 
> You can add additional call into struct imx_weim_devtype for handle
> soc-specific stuff.

Yes, imx_weim_devtype is the place to code soc-specific stuff.  But for
this particular case, an additional DT property is more flexible.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to