The comment was claiming that we were masking all irqs, while the code actually *un*masks all of them.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c index 3761bf1..749a355 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int __init sun4i_of_init(struct device_node *node, writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_ENABLE_REG(1)); writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_ENABLE_REG(2)); - /* Mask all the interrupts */ + /* Unmask all the interrupts, ENABLE_REG(x) is used for masking */ writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(0)); writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(1)); writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(2)); -- 1.9.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
