On 04/22/2014 01:25 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
We need "tblclk" clock data for the functioning of ehrpwm
module. Hence, populating the required clock information
in clock dts file.
Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c | 6 +++
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
index 142009c..869f9a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -87,6 +87,90 @@
clock-mult = <1>;
clock-div = <1>;
};
+
+ ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
+ clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <0>;
+ reg = <0x0664>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
+ clocks = <&ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk>;
+ };
Why do you use composite-clock type here? I see only add one sub-clock
to the composite, thus the composite part is unused. How about using a
gate-clock type only? Same question applies for the rest of the patch also.
-Tero
+
+ ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
+ clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <1>;
+ reg = <0x0664>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
+ clocks = <&ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
+ clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <2>;
+ reg = <0x0664>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
+ clocks = <&ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
+ clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <2>;
+ reg = <0x0664>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm3_tbclk: ehrpwm3_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
+ clocks = <&ehrpwm3_gate_tbclk>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
+ clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <2>;
+ reg = <0x0664>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm4_tbclk: ehrpwm4_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
+ clocks = <&ehrpwm4_gate_tbclk>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
+ clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <2>;
+ reg = <0x0664>;
+ };
+
+ ehrpwm5_tbclk: ehrpwm5_tbclk {
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
+ clocks = <&ehrpwm5_gate_tbclk>;
+ };
};
&prcm_clocks {
clk_32768_ck: clk_32768_ck {
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
index 67c8de5..5413a6a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-43xx.c
@@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ static struct ti_dt_clk am43xx_clks[] = {
DT_CLK(NULL, "func_12m_clk", "func_12m_clk"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "vtp_clk_div", "vtp_clk_div"),
DT_CLK(NULL, "usbphy_32khz_clkmux", "usbphy_32khz_clkmux"),
+ DT_CLK("48300200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm0_tbclk"),
+ DT_CLK("48302200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm1_tbclk"),
+ DT_CLK("48304200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm2_tbclk"),
+ DT_CLK("48306200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm0_tbclk"),
+ DT_CLK("48308200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm1_tbclk"),
+ DT_CLK("4830a200.ehrpwm", "tbclk", "ehrpwm2_tbclk"),
{ .node_name = NULL },
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
