Hi Lorenzo,

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> This patch updates the RTSM dts file with PSCI bindings and nodes
> describing the AEMv8 model idle states parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts | 44 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts
> index d79de9c..4051ffb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts
> @@ -27,37 +27,65 @@
>               serial3 = &v2m_serial3;
>       };
>  
> +     psci {
> +             compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";

Where can I find a PSCI 0.2 implementation for the RTSM VE model? I
couldn't find a link in the cover.

The upstream bootwrapper is not PSCI 0.2 compliant and it does not
implement CPU_SUSPEND.

> +             method = "smc";
> +             cpu_suspend = <0xc4000001>;
> +             cpu_off = <0x84000002>;
> +             cpu_on = <0xc4000003>;

Without "arm,psci" in the compatible list, these three properties are
meaningless.

> +     };
> +
>       cpus {
>               #address-cells = <2>;
>               #size-cells = <0>;
>  
> +             idle-states {
> +                     entry-method = "arm,psci";
> +
> +                     CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0 {
> +                             compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> +                             entry-method-param = <0x0010000>;
> +                             entry-latency-us = <40>;
> +                             exit-latency-us = <100>;
> +                             min-residency-us = <150>;
> +                     };
> +
> +                     CLUSTER_SLEEP_0: cluster-sleep-0 {
> +                             compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> +                             entry-method-param = <0x1010000>;
> +                             entry-latency-us = <500>;
> +                             exit-latency-us = <1000>;
> +                             min-residency-us = <2500>;
> +                     };
> +             };
> +

If this is going to live in the /cpus node, could it please be placed
after the cpu nodes?

>               cpu@0 {
>                       device_type = "cpu";
>                       compatible = "arm,armv8";
>                       reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> -                     enable-method = "spin-table";
> -                     cpu-release-addr = <0x0 0x8000fff8>;
> +                     enable-method = "psci";

Changing the enable-method will break boot on a model when using a
bootwrapper without PSCI support. Really we should leave it up to the
bootwrapper to inject the enable method...

Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to