Hello Yadwinder,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 06/26/2014 01:51 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> Sorry for jumping in late, but just one concern mentioned inline.
>
> [ .. ]
>
>> +
>> +static unsigned long max_gen_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> + unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> + return 32768;
>> +}
>
> Isn't more safer(correct), if it check and return 0 when clk is
> disabled(unprepared) ?
>
Makes sense to me. I'll add a if (__clk_is_enabled(hw->clk)) check in the next
version.
> Regards,
> Yadwinder
>
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
