On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:29:50AM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: > Hence, spi-s3c64xx.c is broken since "Jun 21 11:26:12 2013" and > considering the time with no compliants about the breakage.
I'm not clear what the breakage is? Some boards are broken but what's
the driver issue?
> if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi)) {
> /* Request gpio only if cs line is asserted by gpio pins */
> - if (sdd->cs_gpio) {
> - err = gpio_request_one(cs->line, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
> - dev_name(&spi->dev));
> + if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) {
> + err = gpio_request_one(spi->cs_gpio,
> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
> + dev_name(&spi->dev));
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&spi->dev,
> "Failed to get /CS gpio [%d]: %d\n",
> - cs->line, err);
> + spi->cs_gpio, err);
> goto err_gpio_req;
> }
> -
> - spi->cs_gpio = cs->line;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "chip select gpio is invalid\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
This appears to be making it mandatory to specify a GPIO when previously
it was not mandatory which I believe breaks some SoCs - the native chip
select has to be used on some devices as there is no pinmux option to
make it a GPIO (this was why the native chip select support was added).
Also I'd need to check but are you sure that GPIO 0 is not valid?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
