On Friday 25 July 2014 16:50:10 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> I toyed with the idea of adding the standard cache size specifications
> to the L2C code, it sounds like there's a reason to do that now.
>
> Let's not mess around with adding stuff like the above to work around
> the L2 code not parsing the appropriate specs from DT, let's do the
> right thing and add bindings to allow DT to provide the cache geometry.
Yes, please!
That would actually reduce the realview to just the dma_zone_size
definition, and I think someone also posted a patch to get that from
DT recently. Having realview booting with an empty board file would
be ideal.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
